Active projects
Across 3 client teams
3 reviewers online
Thursday, 10 September
Good afternoon, Higor.
Three projects need your attention. One is ready for approval.
Open comments
3 need clarification
Awaiting review
Latest update 14:32
Ready to deliver
Approved today
PRIORITY
Continue where the decision is
In review
Spring Arts Festival
Campaign key visual and social rollout
- Current version
- V03
- Open feedback
- 3 comments
- Decision owner
- Sofia M.
- Due
- Tomorrow
Raised event hierarchy, simplified sponsor area, increased contrast for outdoor formats.
SMDLEK
2 of 3 viewed V03
Recent activity
- Sofia opened Version 03Spring Arts Festival · 4 min ago
- Daniel replied to comment 02Editorial annual report · 28 min ago
- Lea approved final artworkMusic for Everyone · 1 hr ago
Raised hierarchy and simplified sponsor area.
VERSION HISTORY
Compare V02 with V03
Review the change summary before making a decision.
- Raised event title hierarchy
- Moved date outside the high-detail area
- Simplified sponsor-safe zone
Before feedback
Drag the control to inspect the same artwork before and after the review decisions.
Current version
FINAL HANDOFF
Approval and delivery
The final package is separated from review exports and linked to the approved version.
Ready for a deliberate decision
Approval records the exact version, approver, time, and optional note. Open comments stay visible.
- Approver
- Sofia M.
- Open feedback
- 3 comments
- Requested
- Today · 15:04
DELIVERY
LockedFinal package
Files become available after approval. Their metadata remains tied to Version 03.
Master artworkPDF/X-4 · CMYK · 48.2 MB
Social exports12 files · RGB · 26.8 MB
Usage notesFormat guide · 24 KB
CASE STUDY EVIDENCE
What is real, and what is a hypothesis
This board keeps the concept transparent enough to discuss in an interview.
INTEGRITY NOTE
No real participants were interviewed.
Eight composite interviews were created to structure plausible collaboration problems. They are a hypothesis generator, not user evidence. A real validation round is the next step.
Fragmented workflow
Synthetic participants used three or more tools in one review cycle.
Version uncertainty
They described difficulty identifying the latest file.
Contextless feedback
Comments arrived without an exact visual location.
Ambiguous approval
Conversational language was mistaken for formal approval.
Visual precision without professional-tool complexity.
Make it obvious which version is current, where feedback belongs, who can approve, and what becomes deliverable.
- Versioned review
- Pinned annotations
- Resolved/open state
- Version comparison
- Explicit approval
- Final package
- Payments and contracts
- Chat and video
- Creative-file editing
- AI-generated critique
Upload V03→Review pins→Resolve feedback→Compare versions→Approve→Deliver
REVISION ROOM · V1
Interface foundations and components
A compact, accessible system for creative feedback, explicit decisions, and version-safe delivery.
TYPESystem sans + monospaced metadata
Make the decision visible.
Review work with context
Current version and next action
Humanist clarity for dense product workflows, paired with precise monospaced metadata.
COLORQuiet workspace, artwork-led accents
Studio ink#111318
Slate#686D7B
Canvas#F5F6F8
Cobalt#3E5BFF
Cyan#11BECA
Success#21855B
Attention#B56B18
Critical#B84B55
LAYOUT TOKENS4 px base rhythm
04Micro gap
08Inline gap
16Control padding
24Card padding
32Section gap
481216Full
CORE COMPONENTSDecision-focused states
In reviewApprovedNeeds inputDraft
Color is always paired with explicit text.Write a clear, actionable note…
EXPLICIT APPROVAL
A deliberate record, not conversational ambiguity.Approve Version 03?
Confirm the exact file before delivery unlocks.
✓I reviewed Version 03.
Could the date remain legible at mobile size?